Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traffic in Metro Manila


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. But tag as POV Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Traffic in Metro Manila

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Although there are multiple sources a close read of this will reveal that the article is a rant - an opinion piece studded with PoV too numerous to expect a patroler or other editor to clean up. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  08:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  08:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, but fix the article - If possible, the article must be cleaned up regarding neutrality, plus it looks like an essay that its creator started. Yes, the sources provide notability, but must be displaying a neutral viewpoint per WP:NPOV. The correct way to deal with its POV issue is tagging it with regarding the neutrality issue, not considering deletion per POV grounds. -TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 03:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as per TagaSanPedroAko. Added comment: the article is useful/helpful as it provides context to one of the metropolis' biggest and most daunting problems—traffic. Although POV issue must not be set aside or ignored with.JWilz12345 (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep but clean up removing all POV and unsourced claims. Ajf773 (talk) 21:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.