Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trail Blazers Street Jam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Trail Blazers Street Jam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lacks third-party' reliable sources to indicate notability.

Prod tag removed by one of two main authors, both SPI style accounts. Initial author never replied to my personal note on their talk page.

Has been deleted before (under prod? need admin to check logs). Suggest article be salted. tedder (talk) 23:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Possible keep The article itself is bad. The event itself is probably notable enough, being sponsored by a NBA team for a major charity. Probably news sources could be found. Northwestgnome (talk) 02:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment my news links disappeared (maybe it was on the last prod), but a google news search doesn't show much/any reliable and verifiable coverage. Just press releases. tedder (talk) 02:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete As G11 promotional material. This is basically a copy of a press release, and zero reliable sources can be found on the subject. (I live in Portland, FWIW). Steven Walling (talk) 02:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment If the article is a word-for-word copy of a press release, I think that qualifies for CSD G12 copyvio. Do you have a link to the press release? --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam. The article is entirely promotional. -- Whpq (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can only find one independent reliable source referring to it, and that's a passing reference. Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as spam. This is the press release if not the copy of it. Therefore reason 11 WP:SPEEDY 'Pages that exclusively promote some entity and that would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic'Polargeo (talk) 17:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment as a reminder, in my nomination I asked for someone to look at the page creation history. How many times has it been created and speedy/prod deleted in the past? If it has (as I think it has), I'd recommend salting. tedder (talk) 22:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.