Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trainwreck Riders (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Trainwreck Riders
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A band with no indication of encyclopedic notability. A single instance of in-depth coverage in a reliable source, which happens to be the local newspaper. Tagged as needing additional citations for verification a decade ago; those have not been forthcoming, as they do not appear to exist. Also previously deleted at AfD and thereafter recreated. BD2412 T 05:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  BD2412  T 05:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I found the SFGate article used for sourcing, but there isn't much else to be found. One more article and we'd be at GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 17:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Relisting. Are these new sources of a quality that would allow this article to meet GNG? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 14 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep In addition to the SFGate interview, I found the following:
 * (full length review)
 * (capsule review)
 * Just enough to scrape by on WP:BAND #1. Jfire (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Does not pass WP:GNG.
 * 139.190.236.109 (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.