Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traité didactique de la Plume


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Traité didactique de la Plume

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Book by an unknown author, mentioned in another book by a folklorist, G. Legman, and, as far as I can tell, by no one else. The article's creator said on the talk page in removing my PROD that Legman "included a translation of it from French into English" in his book, but looking at the page citations provided shows that either that's not really true, or the Traité is a very, very short book. This does not meet any of the criteria of WP:NBOOK, such as being "the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works."  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 22:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i SPEAK!! 03:36, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Have a look at this author's talk page - what an utter mess of speedies, afds, prods, redirections and warnings! I have no faith that anything he creates is worth keeping. andy (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. While some might find the subject of the book amusing, the article doesn't say anything to indicate its importance. EALacey (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Item not found in WorldCat. Although this does not disprove its existence, existence does not denote notability. Clifflandis (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.