Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traktionstadtsgesellschaft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Traktionstadtsgesellschaft

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Plot element from one novel, not independently notable (WP:GNG) for lack of substantial third party coverage, not substantial enough to merge.  Sandstein  19:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep It's as notable and well-sourced as anything else in the novels, or in other novels for WP fiction coverage. If you're going to delete it, then delete Phillip Pullman and all points beneath, then head on over to Superman and Pokemon. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No refs have been cited to satisfy WP:N. Edison (talk) 00:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I love the name, but it's clearly not a notable literary concept. Bearian (talk) 01:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete needs third-party sources covering information about reception to WP:verify notability. Can't find any, so it can never meet our basic guidelines. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.