Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tram scrolls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Destination sign. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 23:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Tram scrolls

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has been designed to look like a historical article about tram scrolls but was seemingly created by someone with a conflict of interest (who sells vintage tram scrolls) and then edited extensively by someone else who was paid to so do. All of the "references" included in the article were actually press releases and advertisements directing traffic to a single sales website. I've removed those. It may well be that the subject itself is notable (though I'm struggling to see how) but the history of this article is entirely muddied by COI and paid editing. Stalwart 111  06:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Destination sign, to which 'Destination blind' already redirects. These and 'Bus blind', 'Subway sign' all seem to be the same thing in different varieties of English. One article is enough, quite apart from the CoI / ADV aspect of the current article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd have no problem with that at all - seems very sensible. Stalwart 111  13:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect or Merge to Destination sign, as per Chiswick Chap above. 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 01:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per above. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt (barney)  @ 23:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above, without copying the paid advert. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.