Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tramaine Montell Ford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Neutralitytalk 02:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Tramaine Montell Ford

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article for a background performer of questionable notability. Article has many false or misleading claims (NBC News "honor" was a local newscast, not national; film and TV appearances were as part of a large ensemble, not a featured performer). I can find no mention of his films outside primary sources - not even on IMDB. A Google search shows little significant coverage from reliable sources - most results were primary sources or social media. Google news search shows no results. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:45, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - I didn't see any biographical sources on Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister  talk  19:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ENT with only minor roles. Lacks significant coverage by multiple reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no third party coverage (to verify most of the claims in the article)Curb Chain (talk) 17:52, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Almost there... His career so far is comprised of minor roles, and background dancer gigs, and so fails WP:ENT. In a GNG consideration when looking at ABC News  República  Stage Buzz  Blogtalk Radio  Chicago Now and 'Luxe 7 Magazine my sense is that his career is advancing and he may one day soon meet Wikipedia's notability standards... but WP:NotJustYet.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q.'' 00:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.