Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tramlink Route 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tramlink. czar 06:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Tramlink Route 5

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable article about a tram line which was never built. Not enough sources are available to make it pass WP:GNG. Also may fail WP:CRYSTAL, however I'm not entirely sure this applies as the plans have been cancelled. Class 455 ( talk |stand clear of the doors!)  15:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Class 455  ( talk |stand clear of the doors!)  15:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Class 455  ( talk |stand clear of the doors!)  15:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge into Tramlink. No need for a separate article for a line that was never built, per nom.  Rcsprinter123    (utter)  20:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
 * Delete entirely or just mention it in the Tramlink article. It was only "proposed", doesn't really warrant its own page/section in an article. Nördic   Nightfury  08:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  00:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tramlink. All the important content is already there. &mdash; Train2104 (t • c) 03:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into Tramlink - The route as far as I can see was never built so IMHO it's pointless to have an article on a route that was never even built, Better off merged. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:24, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.