Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tranbjerg (parish of Årre)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  01:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Tranbjerg (parish of Årre)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

After a fair amount of digging, the best I can say about this article (created as an account's only edits in 2007, and only touched since to clear up confusion with Tranbjerg J) is that it's not an outright hoax. The one linked reference (archive) gives no coördinates, but gives the JOG number NN32-02, and Gazetteer of Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Names Approved by the United States Board on Geographic Names does record a Tranbjerg with that JOG number near Årre. However, Danish Wikipedia's only reference to this Tranbjerg is as bebyggelse, ejerlav—roughly meaning "built-up area and land lots", I think?—and Google yields only one relevant result that I can find: about the Tranbjerg Østergaard farm, at almost the exact coördinates given in the gazetteer. So I think this is one of those cases where one database got mixed up about whether something was a settlement or not, and that error propagated a little bit. But, whatever is in Tranbjerg, farmhouse or village, there does not seem to be enough verifiable information to support a Wikipedia article. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 00:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 00:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Mangoe (talk) 03:34, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * delete This strongly resembles the kind of GNIS-derived problem article we've been weeding out for the past several years. We have held things that come up as "locales" non-notable unless there is a great deal of WP:GNG talk about them, and this just does not seem to fit that. Mangoe (talk) 03:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.