Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trance Allstars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Trance Allstars

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A multitude of sins. "combined talents" - unencyclopedic. Articles are not lists unless they expressly state it in the title. Also totally unreferenced. Laun chba  ller  13:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - not finding significant coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Struck my delete !vote per comments below about the band charting. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - My reading of WP:MUSIC is Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart which should be satisfied with 4 charthits in Germany and Austria as well as 3 charthits in Switzerland. Agathoclea (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I suggest you put its chart successes into the article.-- Laun  chba  ller  11:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I put in the refs. I can't convert the templates used on dewiki. Agathoclea (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Just knock up a simple discography like the one at Christian Scharnweber.-- Laun  chba  ller  13:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:GOODCHARTS states that http://www.austriancharts.at/search.asp?search=Trance+Allstars&cat=s are good and so they meet WP:MUSICBIO, but the article needs to be cleaned-up. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Certainly still needs some maintenance, but the most pressing problems have been resolved. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 10:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.