Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trance Metal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Trance Metal

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An IP changed the date on the dated prod template, which counts as a contestation of the prod. No mention of this term in Enter Shikari. Looks like original research. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Okay, the entry in Enter Shikari has been taken care of by the same IP, but it is still original research. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:01, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly original research and unsourced. FireCrystal (talk) 13:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 19 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge to Post-Industrial-Ambient-Drone-Black Metal. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I fail to see how any of those genres are relevant to this genre (though industrial or ambient is probably closest). Plus there's no article but I think you meant any of those genres it could be merged to. However, there is nothing to merge if it can't even be sourced at all. FireCrystal (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my tongue was firmly in my cheek, I was satirising the endless subdivisions of heavy metal. I agree that there's no hope for the article. Fences &amp;  Windows  00:11, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete WP:OR issues. It's possible that there might be a notable article on this subject some day, but if so, this minimal stub will serve no value as a basis for starting. Ray  Talk 20:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.