Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans-Christianity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Johntex\talk 02:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Trans-Christianity
NPOV, original research, and has anyone even heard of this term before? I've had a neutrality dispute up for a week and nothing's happened at all, except that the page's creator deleted my explanation on the talk page (this is still his only article). I didn't nominate off the bat on the off-chance that this is a legitimate user, making a legitimate article, and I still hope it is. But that's not what it looks like. ~ Marblespire 05:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it's so OR it hurts AdamBiswanger1 05:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete trans-Christians play dress-up with the real Jesus ??? I'm at a loss which category to pick, there's so many that apply. So I just leave it at WP:V and WP:OR. ~ trialsanderrors 05:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons given above. David L Rattigan 07:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. --Coredesat 08:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per trialsanderrors.-- Andeh 09:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - the concept is real, but as far as I know, the term is not. The Bible refers to such individuals as "carnal" Christians.  Within society, the term "cafeteria Christians" is used.  I've never heard the term, though. BigDT 11:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Huh????? If this remotely made sense it would still fail on so many levels. - Fan1967 14:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research, even though I like to dress-up.... Ted 14:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * That's trans-something-else, I think, Ted. David L Rattigan 15:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Coredesat.--Auger Martel 16:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone can dig up some citation. I can't. WilyD 18:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero actual google hits via this search. (Ok, three results, but inspection shows they are not uses of the phrase.) No references or citations in the article. 01:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:OR, WP:NPOV &c &c. Also verifiabiltiy and notability problems. Jammo (SM247) 20:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I follow theology to some degree and have never heard this term before. Ace of Sevens 16:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Let's see... WP:OR, WP:V, and possibly WP:NFT and WP:NEO. Grand  master  ka  04:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. Good night! --Slgrandson 04:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP per references. See Willow Creek Community Church and Saddleback Community Church. Also see Prescott EV Free Church. Referenced in several sermons, exegesis, and books in process.--User:cesarb 12:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If Bill Hybels and Risk Warren use the term it might be worth keeping, but they need to be cited in the article rather than simply mentioned in the AfD. (No Vote on the off chance that actual sources emerge) Eluchil404 00:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.