Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TransLink (Brisbane) connections


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. I will userfy it to Figaro's space. -Splash talk 02:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

TransLink (Brisbane) connections
Delete. The page duplicates information in pages such as List of Brisbane bus stations and List of Brisbane railway stations and the various pages for each interchange; I see little need to keep it. It is poorly written and inconsistent with the other articles. SM247 06:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete I agree. --WikiCats 06:51, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep The page was set up for the reason of cataloguing all the contributions of bus information made by SM247 in one single article for greater ease of accessibility. If SM247 wants to decrease the ease of accessibility of his contribution, then that is his perogative. It was not meant to duplicate information, but to complement it, and to gather all the relevant information in one place. Figaro 10:35, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Transwiki this and related pages, possibly to wikitravel. Information is not of an encyclopedic nature, in that it needs to be kept up to date, whereas encyclopedic information does not need to be kept up to date. Andjam 11:50, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Transwikification of material from here to Wikitravel is not legally possible as Wikitravel uses a Creative Commons licence. The article author must resubmit his/her own text. Stifle 18:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. If this page was set up to keep track of User SM247's contributions, it should be set up as a user page or alternatively as a Wikiproject space rather than an article. Capitalistroadster 12:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete if this page really does exist solely to track one user's contributions to a project. That belongs in userspace. Peyna 15:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 12:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC) "Capitalistroadster 12:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 12:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC) "Capitalistroadster 12:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment An entire list of TransLink services already exists, as do lists of every major bus station and every railway station in South-East Queensland, all with connecting routes (for a similar matter, see List of Perth bus stations). This page is about Brisbane anyway, not TransLink, and really is just a travel index.


 * Yep, and - much as I love Brissie - they should be deleted too (bus cruft anyone?). --kingboyk 22:06, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as redundant. Stifle 18:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per Stifle and SM247 Arnzy 00:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.