Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformation fetish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Transformation fetish

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable concept; could not extend beyond dictionary definition only Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * A year ago it was a very thorough article, though it lacked references. Today it's pretty useless, I agree.  It doesn't really matter what's decided here, since 98% of the article's content has already been deleted. LW izard  @ 07:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete virtually no content and what is there is a silly "furry" drawing and a stealth link to a sex site. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.