Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transgender Day of Empowerment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 21:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Transgender Day of Empowerment

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable event mostly limited to one city, with only blogs and one article in that city's gay paper as sources. Seems to be a case of "create the Wikipedia article to get notability" rather than "get notability and then create the Wikipedia article". Rebecca (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - I removed the prod template from this article as I felt there was some evidence of notability, but it's not much; looking at it closely, only one of the sources seems to pass WP:RS. (Yes, I could have just let this article get deleted, but I think it's borderline and deserves wider attention.) Robofish (talk) 16:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge - I think covering it under the section of "Annual events" in Culture of San Diego in a similar style to other events will be good enough.--Revth (talk) 03:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure it's even notable for that - I get the vibe that this more some 25-person thing rather than something with citywide notability - or at least that's what the lack of reliable sources implies. Rebecca (talk) 05:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of RSs and notability. If more sources appear, then a sentence in Culture of San Diego may be useful, but with only one source, this does not have enough notability even for that. I can use the local city paper to source every tiny special interest meeting, but they certainly shouldn't have wiki article if that is the only basis.YobMod 15:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.