Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transgressive phenotype


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to transgressive segregation. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Transgressive phenotype

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nothing but only a single line stating "A Transgressive phenotype is a phenotype that is more extreme than the phenotype displayed by either of their parental lines. Although it is referenced, the lack of other reliable references, combined with a lack of statements, puts this article in a risk of deletion. --Boeing7107isdelicious 05:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, weakly, and without objection to merger somewhere; I'll let biologists worry about where. Google Scholar and books hits suggest use of the concept as described.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge per Smerdis. Having it in the navbox at the bottom makes me leery of merging.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, just needs expanding. Cassandra 73 (talk) 12:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, I acknowledge that the article needs expanding, but this is an important biological concept. Additionally, the reference included is reliable. Nature_(journal) is a highly respected peer reviewed scientific journal with a high impact factor. AJseagull1 (talk) 20:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Updated opinion - Merge with transgressive segregation - AJseagull1 (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.