Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transhuman Coin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Transhuman Coin

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The sources are not independent (either self-published or published by an organization the article says has a relationship with the subject), and remaining sources are listings, etc. Cannot confirm notability. (Also, what does the lede even mean??) Singularity42 (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 13:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * This page appears to be accurate. No reason to delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathanewoods (talk • contribs) 00:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia !. The issue isn't whether the business exists.  The issue is whether it is notable, a requirement for a Wikipedia article: WP:Notability. Singularity42 (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Sources do not rise to the level of reliability required to establish wiki-notability in an area swamped by spam. Yet another cryptocurrency scheme trying to use Wikipedia to help make fetch happen. Yawn. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Addendum The article was created by the user's 11th edit, i.e., as soon as possible. I suspect paid editing. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear fail of NCRYPTO. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.