Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transitalk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Transitalk

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable transit enthusiast site, fails WP:WEB. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * It actually is a notable transit enthusiast site. It has a strong history within the rail and bus fan community for nearly ten years and I find this all to be frivolous and without merit and the page has not violated any wikipedia guidelines. user:seanwarner86Good Night and Good Luck 02:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * How is it notable? There are NO reliable sources establishing any kind of notability based on the guidelines at WP:WEB or WP:N.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:WEB. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 09:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. This was posted on the talk page for this AFD:
 * Thank you to those that backed me up on this article, but due to Mr. Schumin's lack of understanding that this article was written by TTMG/TransiTALK staffers as well as the images were from us and copyrighted by us, they were deleted. I'm letting this article go because It wasn't done and it was reported prematurely and because Mr. Shumin feels that I should get it up to par in 5 days like I live on Wikipedia, I'm letting it all go. Supporters, see us on www.ttmg.org and see our TransitWiki pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trevorlogan (talk • contribs)
 * Take it for what you wish, I suppose. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Deelte - there is no coverage about this website. It may have some popularity with transportation enthusiasts, but note that notability is distinct from popularity, see WP:Notability. -- Whpq (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Either Delete this Page or add an article on Subchat as well - it is about as notable as Larry Fendrick's Subchat. &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 20:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That pretty much boils down to a recommendation to delete. &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 21:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.