Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transition (2020 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. Daniel (talk) 01:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Transition (2020 film)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Same as last time. non-notable film, the only marginally decent source, The Hindu is actually just PR gibberish, presumably submitted to the paper given the lack of byline. previous afd VAXIDICAE💉  17:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt for the same reason as the prior conversations. Is this the same editor who used G7 to avoid a G4, or am I thinking of someone else. If/when this closes as delete, request salt. The reason it's at this page is I SALTed Transition (2020) after repeat re-creations.      StarM 17:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Followup comment, oh now I remember this article. Just noting Sockpuppet investigations/Mangalath jr should they be linked, reather than just a UPE farm.      StarM 17:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Socking has been confirmed. Like I think a solid consensus will help when this editor comes back again.       StarM 00:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm tempted to close this early, but I want this to get more editors arguing for a delete so that when/if the editor tries to create a new account and recreate this, there's a more firm AfD closing to point towards. The prior one closed as a soft delete/G7, so a firmer delete is needed. I would also recommend salting. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, part of the reason I didn't nom it under any speedy criteria is because I'd rather get it sealed and done now rather than after 20 more tendentious recreations. VAXIDICAE💉  19:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable film without sigcov to pass GNG. Salt as was done with Transition (2020) is warranted. WikiVirusC (talk) 21:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt - not even one decent quality source out there for this one. Time to put an end to this saga. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable film. Fails NFILM and GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 11:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.