Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transition Training Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No prejudice against redirecting, WP:BOLD or otherwise. The Bushranger One ping only 21:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Transition Training Academy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It looks like this subject is already discussed in a decent paragraph (but needing citations) on the Wounded Warrior Project article, which manages it. This current article has no citations, reads like a promo piece at times, and I question if TTA is notable on it's own. I propose deletion and/or redirect since it's technically already merged. SarahStierch (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 *  Keep  Wrong forum   Keep   These are all issues that need an editor or editors, not AfD volunteers or administrative tools.  Unscintillating (talk) 04:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Question Hi User:Unscintillating, thanks for your comment. Often bringing things to AfD, when deletion is indeed an option, is easier than hoping someone will pass by a talk page or takes action based on my pinging at WikiProjects. I do have a question: why should it be kept as it's own article and not simply redirected and merged to Wounded Warrior Project where there is a decent and neutral section devoted to TTA? SarahStierch (talk) 15:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that this is a valid question, but IMO it is a decision for the content contributors at Wounded Warrior Project to decide if they want to continue to develop this stub as a breakout article or pull it back to the parent article. Your question seems to imply that I !voted against redirection, so I have re-phrased my !vote.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:49, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. I agree with editor Unscintillating, that this is the wrong forum, and further think this AFD is best resolved by "Keep".  Plus anyone is welcome to suggest at Talk page of the Wounded Warrior Project that this should be merged/redirected there, and then even to proceed with doing that if there are not objections. -- do  ncr  am  22:16, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisting comment - That this has been relisted twice is clear evidence that this can be considered the right forum. Sarah has suggested deletion as a possible outcome owing to concerns of the subject's notability as an individual, which is entirely within AFDs purview. That she suggested a merge may be worthwhile does not make this the wrong venue. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)


 * , please respond to the assertion made on your behalf that it was your intention to take down my !vote, when you relisted rather than moved the discussion. Thank you, Unscintillating (talk) 22:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I view the nomination as valid per concerns about notability and because the nominator has proposed potential deletion as part of the rationale. Relisting does not invalidate any !votes. NorthAmerica1000 08:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * This is not a discussion between the two of us, so I won't respond. I will restore my initial !vote.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.