Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Translink (U) Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Translink (U) Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable per WP:ORGCRITE, no coverage. DferDaisy (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:44, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article on a local-market distributor needs to establish notability independently of the companies whose products it handles. The current article doesn't achieve that. Searches find an Africa Outlook profile piece built around quotes from the company's sales director. Although that might serve as a secondary supporting reference, I don't see it as sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. There is also a brief 2001 item about opposition to a development plan. While these verify the subject as a company going about its business, I don't see WP:NCORP as being met. AllyD (talk) 08:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.