Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmed holding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Transmed holding

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:ORG. Possible WP:PROMO and WP:COI. Adam9007 (talk) 16:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly WP:COI and promotional too. Phrases within the article like ...the company has a solid infrastructure over more... are evidence of this. No reliable sources online show this to be credible enough to have a Wikipedia article. Xaxing (talk) 07:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - distribution companies tend to not really make headlines, and when they do it's generally in the vein of "XYZ merged with ABC" or "Acme distributor MoveCorp..." (i.e. not significant coverage). Since notability is not inherited, the ties with P&G and other global companies don't do much for the article itself (though I did find plenty of references to verify the statements on the page). There might be coverage in Lebanese or African press, but I wouldn't know where to start looking (though I'm open to updating my opinions if some turn up).
 * As a note, PROMO and COI issues are not AFD issues, except in TNT cases of course, and this is not one of those cases. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as corporate spam. Note: WP:NOT is very much an AfD issue. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Good point. I was thinking more along the lines of AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Comment above amended. Primefac (talk) 04:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.