Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmedial play


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Transmedial play

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable neologism. Appears to be an attempt to bootstrap the term into greater currency by creating a Wikipedia article about it. See also Articles for deletion/Transmedia Activism (2nd nomination) -- Rrburke (talk) 03:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Uuugh. I tried to read the article, but I have no idea what they're trying to say. Delete per nom. - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 05:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Delete - reads like total jibber-jabber. Eddie.willers (talk) 16:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio. It's a verbatim copy from Stephen Dinehart's website, where it was posted the month before it was posted here. (The citation in the article is Dinehart's thesis, probably the original source.) --Pnm (talk) 05:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: looks like a pretty clear copyvio. The source noted by Pnm was published 14 May 2008; this page was created 3 June 2008. I've listed it at WP:Copyright problems. We might also want to take a look at Transmedia storytelling. Cnilep (talk) 12:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: In I removed the first two sentences of transmedia storytelling which were appear to have been copied from from http://www.lunchoverip.com/2008/05/from-crossmedia.html . That's all I found, but I also found a dead link source which should be checked. --Pnm (talk) 15:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.