Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmodernism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 07:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Transmodernism
Dictionary definition, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Possible neologism Nertz 05:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to wiktionary. The term is old enough that I've seen it in a not very recent sociology textbook - Peripitus 09:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is currently a two paragraph essay, it is fleshed out beyond a dictionary definition. Unfortunately it also reads like advocacy, so lets clean it up a bit too. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 09:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and flag for cleanup. Isn't there a specific place where literary terms can be flagged for clarification? Vizjim 11:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Has potential for expansion. CP/M 14:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but clean up This doesn't seem like a dictionary definition; I'm not even sure it seems NPOV. --OliverTraldi 15:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if cleaned up. Xyra  e  l  T 19:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean-up per above. Sorry Guy 05:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.