Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparency International Bangladesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - Nahal (T) 09:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Transparency International Bangladesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a branch of a larger organisation that is not inherently notable. Fails WP:ORG SVUKnight (talk) 04:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as not independently notable. We went through a similar process with Rotary International a few years ago, and generally deleted them. I'll get your receipts if you insist; just ping me. Bearian (talk) 18:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep I do not believe that there is a claim of inherited notability. The subject is notable, independent of the parent branch. Coverage from national media in Bangladesh, as seen by the sources in the article and a quick google search, indicates the subject passes WP:GNG.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Had big media coverage on national level. Imtiaz ahmed rifat (talk) 06:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep.Transparency International Bangladesh is a civil society organization dedicated to fighting corruption in Bangladesh. I'm strongly recommend for check those reference. There are [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ] those are reliable source and all of source prove that this article passes on WP:GNG & WP:NCOMPANY. Its is a reputed company/organization in bangladesh on 1996 to still. If Google finds out about this article, a lot of reliable source will be available very quickly. The Delete ! votes above are highly unconvincing and don’t checking or read this reference news or article. this article shouldn’t be delete.- Nahal (T) 07:12, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.