Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transport Giant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep (WP:SNOW). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 20:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Transport Giant

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is on a non-notable computer game. The article makes no claims of its subject's notability whatsoever and has no external sources except for the game's own, official site. As an indication of the article's depth of coverage, the aggregated category links are actually several characters meatier than the entire, two-sentence "main body" of the article. --Dynaflow  babble  19:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - The game is crap. I may still have my copy kicking around somewhere.  But it is notable for having garnered reviews including from dead tree newspapers like Birmingham Evening Mail.  -- Whpq (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - quick search of Metacritic and Game Rankings produces enough sources to attest to notability. It might be poorly constructed at the moment, but it has the potential for a quick and snappy article. -- Sabre (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sabre's findings. There's enough there to establish sufficient notability; they just need to be added. MuZemike 20:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.