Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transporter (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. The discussion was already relisted three times and still no substantial discussion took place. Thus the close is no consenus with the leave for speedy renomination. A merge discussion can take place at the article talk page. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Transporter (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Disputed prod, the album has not been reviewed by Pitchfork as deprodder says. No significant coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Mattg82 (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge selectively to Immaculate Machine. In fairness to deprodder, his/her arguments referred to the band only, and are valid--but only for the band, which doesn't much matter for this discussion. This album was not reviewed by Pitchfork, or really anywhere, that I can see. And none of its songs were ever featured on iTunes--in fact, this album is not available at all on iTunes. If substantial sourcing can be found, I am happy to reconsider. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 20:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 03:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.