Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transporter reversal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Rusf10 (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Transporter reversal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page has no references. However, I admit I do not have enough knowledge of the subject to know if it merits an article and just needs to be improved. Rusf10 (talk) 22:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep – Just because a Wikipedia article is unreferenced does not mean the article topic is not notable. This search of the phrase in medical journal article titles clearly establishes its notability.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢) 21:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've added 3 medical reviews and 2 primary source references to this article that extensively cover the topic of this article.  In the future, it would be prudent to ask about the notability of a topic which you're unfamiliar with on the article talk page or the talk page of the WikiProjects which it's tagged as being within the the project's scope.  In this case, Talk:Transporter reversal is tagged as part of WP:NEURO, WP:PHARM, and WP:MCB.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢) 21:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as a standalone page (but maybe rename as reverse transport), as well as merge in WP:Summary style into membrane transport protein. The topic is widely discussed in the scientific literature, and is clearly notable. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.