Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transtopianism (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Transtopianism
The article was created and deleted before (see Articles for deletion/Transtopianism). Originally I speedily deleted it; now I am restoring it and bringing it here for more discussion (on creator's request and because the content is different enough to warrant a new vote). However, I don't believe it's notable enough to justify its inclusion in an encyclopedia. Weak delete. - Mike Rosoft 13:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no convincing assertion of notability. Sandstein 18:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it seems to be a very minor and somewhat shoddy offshoot of transhumanism. (I changed my opinion after a little research.) --70.48.242.224 00:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Is there any set criterion of 'notability'? If so, let me know. It did seem small to me, but the mailing list has over 900 members. I cant see how including relatively small movements would harm wikipedia. Crippled Sloth 22:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.