Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trap Youngan Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Trap Youngan Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod removed by creator on the basis that "we're verified on google" however I can find no evidence that this is a notable label. There are no independent sources which would contribute to notability and afaict, no accomplishments that would satisfy any of the variants of nmusic/ncorp. Praxidicae (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as no demonstrated notability. I had placed the original proposed deletion tag with the reason "No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Google search for name comes up with fewer than 100 results, none of which discuss the label in any significant way." ... disco spinster   talk  15:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Disco.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 16:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Response for: ”Delete per nom and Disco.” How can you say something should be deleted just cause one person said it. You’re not playing by the rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.129.197.17 (talk) 21:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC) — 107.129.197.17 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep Trap Youngan Records was the first record labels in it’s area, TYR was the first music distribution company in it’s area, TYR was lots of publicity on Instagram, they preform throughout the United States, and they’re verified on Google. They were the first at some of everything in their area. How could you consider them to not be notable? They’ve literally reached thousands of people, when their city barely has a thousand people. If that’s not notable, I don’t know what is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.29.211.246 (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC) — 207.29.211.246 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Trap Youngan is a upcoming label and the owners of Trap Youngan are very well known locally. Trap Youngan is already and has been for awhile Google certified. This label has music on all the main platforms including google play, apple music, dezzers,ect. Their artists @lahnookbadazz & @richest_jayy have two upcoming shows go look on their social medias to find more about that. Find the owners by googling @lahmaury and @richest_jayy they are under the same name on all social media. They both have over 15k and elevating everyday. They also have their own website https://trapyrecords.wixsite.com/trap . They even have their own clothes brand for sell find out more by googling trap youngan designer. TRAP YOUNGAN RECORDS IS WIKIPEDIA WORTHY AND ITS NOT HARD TO TELL. If anyone disagree then they probably never had to come up out the mud with something and turn nothing into something. The Members even have bios in magazines to tell you about them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.29.211.246 (talk) 18:53, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete – A big red flag is that their website is on Wix.com, which is a free website builder that anyone can use to make a website. No indication that this label has received any attention at a level that would make them notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. It doesn't look like their artists have been reviewed by any major (e.g. national readership) publication. Mz7 (talk) 22:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - Anybody can create a website, no matter who they use to do it. Yeah, we’re not on Sony Records’ level, but we’re still notable. Wikipedia doesn’t require that you be reviewed major publicist. It seems like you’re trying to find a problem that doesn’t exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lahmaury (talk • contribs)  — Lahmaury (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * and : "Wikipedia doesn’t require that you be reviewed by a major publicist"... yes, unfortunately it does... or rather, notability on Wikipedia is determined by the amount of coverage you have received from reliable sources that are not related to the subject (so your own social media and blogs don't count, articles in newspapers or established online websites do). You have to show that the subject passes the criteria at WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT to justify a Wikipedia article. Just existing as a brand and having a website and social media is not enough. Richard3120 (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Soft delete - perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON - right now does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:ORGCRITE, which requires that "it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" - publicity on Instagram, having a website and clothing line is not a basis for notability - if the company does achieve notability it can be refunded - Epinoia (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , you can't choose a "soft" delete... that only happens when nobody has taken part in the discussion, which is not the case here, and is a decision made by the closing admin. So either you think it should be kept or deleted. Richard3120 (talk) 21:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * My apologies if I misunderstood the guideline - Epinoia (talk) 21:59, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete since subject fails WP:CORP. If we had notability criteria specifically for record companies (we don't; see here) we could perhaps have kept the article. As things stand, we cannot. -The Gnome (talk) 09:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that even if we had specific guidelines for record labels, this would still not meet it. Praxidicae (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Specific notability guidelines for record labels wouldn't necessarily be a bad idea, but I would imagine at a minimum they would require coverage in multiple, independent sources, and a roster of at least two notable acts, neither of which are met here. Richard3120 (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.