Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trappole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 11:44, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Trappole

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unreferenced article about a book which fails to meet the notability criteria. Indeed the article text itself asserts the book's non-significance. (A CSD category for books is really needed.) A Prod notice was removed by an IP so I am bringing it to AfD. AllyD (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete As per the original PROD rationale: fails WP:NBOOKS. A bio created for the author was deleted as well for failing WP:AUTHOR. We really need an A9 equivalent for books. § FreeRangeFrog croak 16:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The book does exist - ISBN 9788856717990 - but there is no indication that it meets the standard of WP:Notability (books), and indeed the article more or less asserts that it does not. JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete An unreferenced article about a non-notable book. The article itself says that the book wasn't very successful.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  20:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - The author of this book used to have a page on WP too and it was recently deleted (see Corinna_Carbone). Trappole is an independent auto-produced book that fails to meet WP:NBOOK. Toffanin (talk) 09:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with Toffanin, an awkard promo page.--Lal.sacienne (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Note that this comes from a student who I asked to improve Wikipedia as a class project.  I believe it is her mother's novel, hence the quotations without references.  The student did not intend a commercial purpose here.  That said, this does fail to meet notability criteria.  Thank you editors for taking the time to teach her this lesson!  --User:JediLibrarian  —Preceding undated comment added 20:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.