Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trash Monsters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 01:29, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Trash Monsters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Relatively new band, fails WP:BAND. Independent sources are unreliable, and main page is at Facebook. hmssolent \Let's convene My patrols 01:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Unfortunately, I am unable to include the links to the two Orange County Music Examiner articles as the "examiner dot com" prefix is on the WP spam blacklist. I can see that this might make one think the source is "unreliable" but, they are legitimate music/event reviews, easily found via Google. I have removed the Facebook link that was a reference. This band has had a handful of band members who are notable in the punk/ska scene pass through its ranks. I was unsure how to document this w/o removing focus from the band as an intact entity - and did not want to leave unfinished traces in the article history. After further research, the band's official web page is on Facebook (not entirely uncommon these days).
 * Isolde2000 (talk) 04:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, examiner.com is not a reliable source as indicated at WP:RSN (see archive). No significant coverage of the subject in non-primary reliable sources to indicate the subject is notable per WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Perhaps it is too soon.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources for this group; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND.  Gong   show  12:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.