Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trashwiki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Not notable. Blogs are not reliable sources. Malinaccier (talk) 00:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Trashwiki

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

delete and redirect to Transwiki log nn website.--EWJNK (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC) EWJNK (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Why delete? How can it be improved? --Sigurdas (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is about a subject for which it is hard to find the normally required Wikipedia specification references. On the other hand, there are many references to Trashwiki in the frowned upon blogs etc area. This is where I would expect to find mentions, rather than in The Times or Pravda. There are enough relevant ghits to satisfy me that the subject has notability even though the purists may discount these as blog stuff. (In most cases, I do too - where 'reliable' references should be expected to be found.) I do confess to skip rummaging on occasion - at the roadside not at shops. I collect scrap aluminium and copper for a Cub Scout group, and have collected bricks for home projects. and wood for bonfires. Peridon (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. A single mention in the Make blog doesn't really count as much, especially considering how short it is. Skip the suggested cross-namespace redirect, though. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 10:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blogs are not reliable sources. Do not redirect. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.