Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TravBuddy.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was del mikka (t) 01:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

TravBuddy.com
Not notable, new website as of November 2005. Article created by site webmaster. -- Longhair 21:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Longhair 21:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

I would also add that Wikipedia's many biographies, including many for professors or others who have written obscure books, offer fairly little in the way of content. In fact, I feel it is extremely biased for you to consider a professor who perhaps wrote one or two books years ago to be more valuable than a currently growing and updated web site. Dlazzaro 22:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I disagree. Many articles on Wikipedia do not affect millions of people, yet they are not instantly deleted. I think you should reconsider this decision. BTW, I am the article creator for the record, and sorry about my several edits, I am still getting a hang of the wiki code.Dlazzaro 22:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC) Edited: Dlazzaro 22:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam/vanity--Bugturd 22:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete as non-notable website.  Traffic Rank for travbuddy.com:  142,087.  It looks promising though -- I suspect it will be more notable in a month or two and in that case the article can be re-created.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-27 23:32Z 


 * Strong Delete per orginal reasons. --^BuGs^ 00:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, advertisement.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep has a bit of recognition by other sites. Ruby 01:22, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Ifnord 14:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.