Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travel For Care


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Travel For Care

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article was created by a blocked WP:SPA with no other edits other than related to "Travel For Care".
 * This is one Part of a broader history of Spam and promotion on Wikipedia, see also -WPSPAM Item

Has a 2 links but they seem merely trivial coverage or mentions. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. which is clearly noted in the notability guidelines. Advert. Self-promotion and product placement are WP:NOT the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 19:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no indication that the company meets guidelines for corporations - trivial references, no substantial coverage outside of its own sphere. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 21:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 21:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.