Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travel Insurance Direct


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Travel Insurance Direct

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Trying very hard to not be an advert, but still failing. News/Google shows no evidence of notability or WP:CORPDEPTH. BrigadierG (talk) 00:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 08:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom, I am unable to find any references that meet NCORP's criteria for establishing notability, most are regurgitated PR or Primary sources.  HighKing++ 19:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.