Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travel Weekly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Travel Weekly

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Semi-advertorialized article about a news website, not reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for web content. Of the fourteen footnotes here, fully 12 are self-published by the company itself, on its own website or its social networking profiles -- and while the other two are to a real (albeit limited circulation) publishing trade magazine, they both read like thinly veiled rewrites of the company's own press releases rather than actual independent journalism. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this company from having to get over WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH on coverage in sources independent of its own self-created web presence. Bearcat (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete — Per painstaking detailed explanation by . Celestina007 (talk) 17:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.