Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travelers Insurance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, then redirect to Travel insurance. - Bobet 22:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Travelers Insurance
Advertising spam, copyvio but since author claims permission given I'd rather have it delete through AfD. - Mailer Diablo 13:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC) -
 * We certainly could use a good article on travel insurance, but this is so far from an encyclopedic article that this most likely will not be it. It reads like an essay summing up all the disadvantages of travel insurance, so my vote is Delete, unless someone sees an opportunity to salvage this into a real article. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 13:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * At this point I have salvaged another article, Travel insurance, which was changed into a redirect to Travelers Insurance a couple of days ago. Therefore I now suggest a redirect to Travel insurance. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 13:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * REDIRECT per the salvaged article Reinorutr/Cpt. Morgan found. --Bschott 14:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate between the new travel insurance article and St. Paul Travelers, a notable insurance company. Those who land on this page might be looking for either one.  - Smerdis of Tlön 14:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to travel insurance. -- P199 17:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd love to, I really do, but can you please elaborate on what exactly you think can be merged? The article is very POV, so I would prefer to not include anything from it in travel insurance. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 19:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as copyvio per nom. The proper title of this article should be travel insurance as indicated above. The recovered article could be expanded, but this content has to go, and the redirect to St. Paul Travelers should be restored per Smerdis of Tlön. -- Slowmover 21:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete WP:SPAM cut and dried advertisement masquerading as articles. Ohconfucius 02:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per above Konman72 06:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete The article is completely factual and accurately cited. It would  stand up well against peer review.  The article has more detail than many wikipedia entries, and is much more informative than the existing [Travel Insurance] article.  It is likely that those with stakes in InsureMyTrip.com are trying to remove this article from Wikipedia.  In order to remove the article it should be neccessary to actually discredit its contents.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pfein (talk • contribs) 13:27, 14 August 2006  (UTC)
 * Delete text and redirect per Cpt. Morgan. - David Oberst 09:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Further Comment: There is also a redirect at traveler insurance to this article which should be dealt with as well by the closing admin. - David Oberst 22:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete this is nothing like any wp article. --Effoveks 17:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Travel insurance as silly POV fork or ad or essay or whatever. Sandstein 19:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.