Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 15:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Travia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable and apparently defunct online RPG. Project website has been "closed for renovation" at least since April 2007 (courtesy of Internet archive); Alexa rank over 800.000 and never was less than 100.000. The majority of links in the article no longer work. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 08:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 
 * Comment, notability isn't temporary, but is there any evidence that the game ever got out of beta? Burzmali 14:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mike Rosoft 12:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete There's nothing really notable about the project. It's one of a multitude of failed RPGs, the project is dead, all refs are either to dead links or to fansites. If anything, the article is unclear on many points ("It ended its open beta in March and will be finally open in summer." - what summer? 2006? 2007?) Yngvarr (t) (c) 12:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - The references provided in the article are not reliable sources, as they are from the developer/publisher of the game. A google search shows it being mentioned a lot, but again, no reliable sources.  The closest is an IGN wiki, but then of course, anybody could pop content into it.  A Google news search reveals press release type information.  There appears to be foreigh language coverage (Japanese), but I can't read it thus the "weak" on the delete. -- Whpq 16:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.