Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis McCrea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 04:51, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Travis McCrea

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of reliable secondary sources B (talk) 12:32, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I considered a redirect to one of the associated "parties", but in reality the subject has not had a particularly important role in any of them, and what roles he's had have not been the subject of significant independent coverage. And beyond the association with these organizations, there is no notability to speak of. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject has not been elected, and his (minor) position with the Pirate Party does not merit a redirect. There also does not appear to be enough significant coverage to meet WP:GNG Enos733 (talk) 20:00, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, certainly doesn't meet POLITICIAN, and doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG.  PK  T (alk)  17:02, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of reliable secondary sources and notability. Gamaliel (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Abstain - lean to delete - I am Travis McCrea, I am the standing leader of the Pirate Party of Canada (which is not listed on the article), but my predecessor never had nor needed an article and I don't need one either. I would argue the Pirate Party as notable but other notable Canadian minor political parties have leaders who are not as notable Canadian Action Party being one of them. Pride would like me to have an article, but it's really not important either way. If I could be objective I would argue an article on me would be "notable enough" but "not worth fighting over". &#9760;  Travis McCrea (T)(C) 20:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.