Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Williams (chemist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:18, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Travis Williams (chemist)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ACADEMIC Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 18:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. If as the article says he's an assistant professor whose most notable achievement is a CAREER award (an early-career award that is given to a high fraction of faculty in the sciences at research universities) then it's quite likely that he doesn't yet pass WP:PROF, although he may well do so in a few years. The Google scholar citation record bears this out, too: his work doesn't have high enough citation counts to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF, and the other criteria seem to also not be there. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:13, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * delete - not only fails WP:ACADEMIC, it looks more like a profile than an article. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Question. There is a highly cited T J Williams in neurobiology, but it seems that this not this subject. What are the cites on GS? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.