Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treacherous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. Neil  ╦  10:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Treacherous

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The first user who added a prod tag wrote, "No label, self-pressed and online distribution only, only local performances, no awards, etc., and a smattering of reprinted press releases and forum mentions does NOT meet WP:MUSIC" - and I agree with that statement. daniel folsom  11:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)




 * I have added Iron Crescent and Impact (rapper) to this nomination. Clearly the rappers have no coverage outside their group, and they should either be merged into Iron Crescent, or else all three deleted, depending on whether people feel their group has sufficient coverage. Fair? --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 15:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with nom. Not notable, unsourced, does not meet WP:MUSIC. ikh (talk) 16:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I am still learning the format of Wikipedia, however i would prefer to save the templates, its fine to Merge Impact (rapper) with the Iron Crescent tag, as well i need to also merge Treacherous with the Iron Crescent tag. Lastly once i figure this all out, i need to get focussed on referencing all the quotes. I have the links from google, however i need to save all the info off wikipedia before its deleted. As well i need to re-create a article for Ridicule, i made the attempt before, but it was deleted User: Cypherous 14:02 30, May 2007
 * Well if it was deleted you should strongly consider whether you should re-create it again. Pages are only deleted if they violate wikipedia policy. In this case, for example, it seems as the rappers and their collective do not meet the requirements of the Wikipedia policy on Notability and Music. And the problem is - the current proposal is to delete all three - meaning we wouldn't merge it. daniel  folsom  21:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Correction, it was not deleted. And fine, forget the merge. Im adding references from reliable sources. if it doesnt meet WP:MUSIC standards then so be it. i wanted to learn the process for writing an article. still learning, so if its deleted, then i guess there not much more contesting left--Cypherous 02:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't even claim notablilty. No third party sources. Closenplay 12:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.