Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treadsetter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Treadsetter

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a neologism that was just made up one day. I don't think this is vandalism to the point of meeting any of the criteria for speedy deletion, but its close.  Them From  Space  00:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Indeed. A made-up neologism that fails to verify any sort of notability with reliable sources. -- Scjessey (talk) 00:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--per nom and Scjessey. Drmies (talk) 00:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Drmies. Gosox5555 (talk) 02:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. - TexMurphy (talk) 02:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously; borderline A1 patent nonsense or G3 hoaxy vandalism per WP:CSD. --Jayron32. talk . contribs  05:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Utter nonsense. sixty nine   • spill it •  06:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no relevant ghits, delete per nom. PamD (talk) 07:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NEO. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Delete: per WP:MADEUP. Iowateen (talk) 19:58, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.