Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treatment: Tokyo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Dave Gibbons. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Treatment: Tokyo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

PROD removed. essay-style review. notability not established. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. This seems to be a new comic book released through a new app. See here and here. It seems it is the app that is getting the coverage, with this comic only getting mention as one of the things available through the app. So far, I don't see any independent coverage, but it might be WP:TOOSOON. The co-author/supervisor Dave Gibbons is notable, however. Note that I removed copy pasted text from here. Michitaro (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:19, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:19, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Dave Gibbons. Right now the coverage is pretty much focusing on the app, with the comic being mentioned but not being the focus of the articles. Since you have a known entity making the comic it's likely that it will get coverage in the future, but we can't guarantee that it will, so it's like it's said above: it's just too soon to say that this comic will become notable. I think that this would probably be a good redirect to Gibbons for now. I was going to see if I could rescue this, but pretty much the only sources out there are more about the app than the comic and it's just too soon.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect - This currently has no independent non-trvial coverage. It may someday. A redirect or delete would both work, but the redirect would channel people to an appropriate article where it could be mentioned briefly.I would encourage the nominator to just redirect articles like this where there is a known notable component other than the specific topic of the article. DreamGuy (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Redirecting to Gibbons is probably the best option, but it should be made clear that he is not the author of this comic, but its "executive producer" as it states here. Michitaro (talk) 23:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.