Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treatment of epilepsy in dogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 03:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Treatment of epilepsy in dogs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reads more like a research paper than an encyclopedic article; appears to be original research or synthesis. Proposed deletion removed by article's creator without an explanation. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia,

Recently I have written down a short article entitled "Treatment of epilepsy in dogs". My aim was to provide an update about the treatment of canine epilepsy based on the recently published papers. The article is considered by wikipedia as "article for deletion". I do not understand the reason tot ell you the truth because I do use references to refer to the original papers published. I have created this article based on the current evidence driven by enthusiasm to share knowledge; and this is my first article in wikipedia.

Therefore, I would like your feedback on this and let me know the reason for deletion please. I am happy to improve it according to your feedback.

Kind Regards,

~Dr Pete Andrews~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrPeteAndrews (talk • contribs) 23:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * See also my response on the user's talk page. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete and Merge with Epilepsy in animals, especially the section on treatment of canine epilepsy. Delete per nom: WP:NOR. Shanata (talk) 09:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge with Epilepsy in animals. Dr. Pete Andrews, if you read this, please don't be discouraged. Please keep contributing! BakerStMD T&#124;C 21:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete without redirect (a five-word phrase is an unlikely search/redirect term). Pax 01:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete improbable article title. But the topic is notable, and the animal epilepsy article is about canine epilepsy, where treatment should be discussed. MicroPaLeo (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.