Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trees are Memories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, no assertion of notability per speedy delete cat. a7 (web). NawlinWiki (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Trees are Memories

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This short film seems unremarkable to me, I can't find anything on Google except for the trailer which is on YouTube. There is only an unofficial website hosted on Freewebs. As much as I support this films cause, I don't think it has a place on Wikipedia. Regards, CycloneNimrod Talk? 14:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:N I also only found only you tube Jeepday (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No references to reliable sources to indicate notability per WP:N or WP:MOVIE. The film is not even listed at IMDb. Nsk92 (talk) 17:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject is not notable, and I cannot find any reliable sources that would assert notability. WilliamH (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as this strongly fails the notability guideline for films. It's a short film created to raise money for a local hospital. Good idea, sure, but not notable. B figura  (talk) 00:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't see anything to indicate that it's notable. Note that I am the one who originally placed db-spam on it. Pyrospirit  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 13:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Yes I realised that, however, since it has failed a previous CSD, I had to place the article up for AfD. I hope you understand. Regards, CycloneNimrod Talk? 14:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, no, it wasn't a failed CSD. The author removed it, so that should have been reversed and a warning left. Generally, only an admin is allowed to remove a CSD. The same person keeps removing the AfD notice as well.AnmaFinotera (talk) 15:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as blatant ad for completely unnotable "film" and its website and YouTube video. AnmaFinotera (talk) 15:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I do not think that this should be deleted... as there must be a good reason some one put it on here in the first place... I bet it will turn up on imdb sooner or later... just let it be, fussing over it won't help anyone... it will just waste your time. I'ts not hurting anyone is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poiuyla (talk • contribs) 11:27, May 12, 2008 — Poiuyla (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Do not Delete per WP:N I found it on IMDB pro... which means it will appear on imdb soon... so it is notible. I also emailed great Ormand Street Hospital, and they backed the project up,  12 May 2008 (User talk:No user)(UTC) — 78.147.0.74 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Existance on IMDB Pro, nor IMDB does not indicate notability per WP:N. Requires significant coverage in MULTIPLE sources, not a supposed single mention on a site requiring registration. AnmaFinotera (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes it does, as IMDB check their listings very carefully —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwertypix (talk • contribs) 17:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)  — Qwertypix (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Again, no it does not. Existance on IMDB is not a criteria for notability. And vote stacking is highly inappropriate. AnmaFinotera (talk) 18:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Do Not Delete I agree.... this film seems fully notible... I don't understand what everyone is getting at? It is on IMDB pro.. and maybe its just not released yet... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwertypix (talk • contribs) 17:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC) — Qwertypix (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.