Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trekforce Expeditions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus is now clear  DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Trekforce Expeditions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. looks like an advert. a mere 2 gnews hits. LibStar (talk) 05:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now unfortunately as although I'm very fond of conservation and nature, my searches simply found nothing better (with "Trekforce Expeditions United Kingdom") aside from some links at News, Books and browser. This simply hasn't changed much since June 2007 and it's unlikely it's going to happen anytime soon. BTW were you watching this since January 2014 or had you randomly encountered it again? Pinging .  SwisterTwister   talk  07:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Swister, I had watched it for a while. LibStar (talk) 23:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 00:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Pinging interested subject users, , and .  SwisterTwister   talk  19:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't imagine why I have been pinged, as I have never edited the article or the Talk page. That said, it's in very bad shape and needs neutral sources and a rewrite. Jus  da  fax   20:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes but I actually pinged because your name as a member at WikiProject Environment. SwisterTwister   talk  20:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah OK. I Googled the org, which is apparently a charity, but don't see a lot of WP:RS in the five minutes I looked, but there are numerous hits of sources of various quality. I'm on the fence, frankly. The org exists, and may be notable by our standards with some work. Or not. Jus  da  fax   20:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can't see any significant notability here and I am equally dubious about the environmental credentials. Catering for Gap year students is often cloaked in the respectability of "environmentalism" but doesn't often deliver. From the article and what little seems to exist on the web I cannot make a judgement about this outfit except that if fails WP:GNG.  Velella  Velella Talk  21:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.