Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trelawny Island


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Looe Island. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Trelawny Island

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable geographical feature. This Google Maps satellite image gives an idea of how small this is. 'Navigation' section unsourced and contrary to WP:NOTHOWTO. Chartlet likely to be deleted from commons as a copyright violation. Little prospect of expansion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Existence of a small rock in the river is not notability. Not finding sources to verify or establish notability of contents. Reywas92Talk 18:12, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of islands of Cornwall, River Tamar, or Calstock since even the OS doesn't name it (although does show an island in this location), there is very little online and a search in quotes only returns about 815 Google hits (and some of those appear to be from a places called "Trelawny" in Jamaica) and I don't see any evidence of coming close to meeting GNG, otherwise delete since its debatable if it should even be mentioned in another article. Only online source doesn't mention the island and doesn't seem to be an RS.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 19:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk )  19:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


 * All of the content with linked sources is about something else, and the content about this subject has no sources, or was sourced to a WWW page advertising an app for a mobile telephone. This seems to be an unnamed and undocumented place.  Wikipedia's map links unhelpfully put Wikipedia's name as a marker on the maps.  So I tried the U.K. Ordnance Survey.  There's no name for this place there.  I read some sources that document the things to be found along the length of the river, and they do not even mention this, by a name or otherwise.  There's just nothing to write about this subject that accords with our content policies, and nothing supporting even a redirect.  Uncle G (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Looe Island, as the small island to the south-east of Looe island is called Trelawny Island, a fact that is mentioend in that article. Looking at old OS maps, the island in the Tamar is never named, whereas the island by Looe Island is consistently a named feature (albeit its name has changed).Pontificalibus 11:59, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd agree with that, indeed it is mentioned there with a source and although it doesn't appear on 19th or 20th century OS maps I think the source is OK. With the current article, although we know that there is indeed a tiny island at the described location and thus its not a hoax, we don't have any sources to say that the island is called "Trelawny Island" thus WP:V isn't satisfied.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 16:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find that name on a map, either, but supports this name for that place, and that seems like a good redirect target to me, too. Uncle G (talk) 00:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * As nom, I'd support that redirect. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.