Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trello


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Trello

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Reason

Contested proposed deletion; Yet another minor "project management" website or software. The article's only claim to historical or technical importance of the sort that would make this software package a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article is a claim to have been named "The 7 Coolest Startups You Haven’t Heard of Yet" which offers no notability in the wider world. All other offered references are internal to the business. The article itself is simply a features list, which essentially makes Wikipedia a free web host for advertising: this is essentially a sales brochure. Google News would appear to yield nothing but press releases and advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoudHowie (talk • contribs) 7 February 2012
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: this one is notable indeed. The article features references to LifeHacker and Wired (though this one isn't suitable for WP:N purposes). Apart from those I found:
 * I think it's enough for both WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's enough for both WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's enough for both WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's enough for both WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: you won't read about Trello in The Economist; what sort of notability are we after? It's a software project that TechCrunch has written about. That should be enough. Disclosure: I do not use Trello, and don't even like it; I simply am highly knowledgeable about web-based project management software. As a software developer and the main contributor to the Trello article, I feel pained when deletionists like the nominator contribute nothing to Wikipedia and instead nominate software projects for deletion. Awaiting a litany of WP: policies cited as grounds for dismissing my arguments,  Dandv ( talk &#124; contribs ) 01:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC).


 * Keep: seems significant enough. Shlomif (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: I am a competitor (!). I would egoistically have any reasons to vote for deletion. However, it would be _incredible_ if Trello disappeared from Wikipedia. I am writing this without ever talking to the Trello people, and not expecting absolutely anything back. I consider myself an expert in the field, and trello is definitely notable.Tony Mobily (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.