Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tremaine Emory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 20:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Tremaine Emory

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The tag says it all: "reads like a press release or a news article and may be largely based on routine coverage." - There is no notability on display here and having 'done work' with a range of fashion brands does not - press release coverage and interviews notwithstanding - notability impart. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This article does not come close to meeting inclusion criteria. Wikipedia is not supposed to restate press releases, we need reliable indepdent sourcing, not press releases.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage in GQ and British GQ, along with many sources. First one on the list in GNews is British GQ. Oaktree b (talk) 14:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Georgia (U.S. state),  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep He was covered by the NYTimes, how more legit mainstream coverage can you receive as a designer? Liz Read! Talk! 04:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - mainstream coverage in publications like GQ and NYT. Article needs work, but I belive that the subject passes GNG. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.